2005 is becoming, "The Year of the Sphere" See the "Big Picture"
Thanks to everyone who
commented on the original
UFO find, although we’re still
not sure what they are, there’s
been some interesting
developments.
Ian Pottinger and jher were the
first to find that there are in
fact eight of these UFOs over
Florida, at the following points
One - Two - Three - Four
and Tensus used keyhole to
map the points showing that
they make a very neat grid.
Yoshino and jher later noticed
that the UFOs are not limited to
Florida but can also be found
over L.A.
One - Two - Three - Four - Five -
Six - Seven - Eight - Nine - Ten -
Eleven - Twelve - Thirteen
and Tensus again mapped the
points, which appear in an
almost straight line.
Things the UFOs are definitely
not…
Space debris or another
satellite?
Derek & Tensus discovered
that the close-up images of
Florida are taken by
AerialsExpress.com at an
altitude of 17,500 feet so are
aerial photos and not satellite
images.
Marks added to obscure
famous peoples homes?
While there’s no doubt the
whitehouse photos were
processed for security it is very
unlikely these UFOs are
intentional ‘cover-ups’ due to
the neat grid layout.
Water towers?
The UFOs are just too big to be
water towers (and there’s no
shadow).
Anomaly produced by the
stitching software?
Shi Ju says
Definitely they’re NOT marks
for picture stitching. In most
stitching software (like for
making panoramas) the
algorithm comes down to
finding sharp and contrasting
details and aligning those spots
with each other.
Things the UFOs still could be…
An alien spacecraft?
It’s still possible!
A weather balloon?
Tm says
The “Grid” is centered around
an airfield, common launch
points for weather balloons.
Although Klem says
All currently used radiosonde
devices (weather balloons) are
latex, yellowish beige to
transluscent
and Jello adds
The object in question here
does not cast a ground effect,
therefore does not exist in the
air.
A ‘lenticular’ cloud?
Patrick was the first to float
this idea and the images he
posted do look similar to the
UFOs, although it is unlikely
clouds would form in neat
grids.
Condensation on the lens?
Possibly the current forerunner
for most likely explanation,
Stuart said…
Condensation inside some sort
of housing would be my guess.
If the drop were directly on the
lens it would be effectively
invisible. Put it a few
inches/feet away and have the
camera shooting with a very
deep depth of field (as you
would with a small aperture)
and it would look just like that
anomaly.
Something else?
Possibly one of: Peppermint,
baseball, Vogon ship, crop
circle, planet, thumbtack,
ballbearings, smoke, pond,
swamp gas, golf ball, satellite,
flying ninja, space junk or
contact lens as others have
suggested!
larger image.
{Thanks to Rense.com}
I snapped this image on 8 Jan 05 at 10:48 am from my back yard
here in New Zealand. First real blue sky we have seen in this
neck of the woods for weeks with several CT's overhead which
I photographed. I noticed an "Orb" shaped anomaly (right end
of CT) in this image after download. I took several shots of this
same CT in succession using the continuous shoot mode on my
Nikon D70 DSLR, with the anomaly appearing only in this one
frame. It was shot in NEF RAW & JPEG copy mode. The
pictured image has been resized from 3008 x 2000 to 640 x 426.
The inserts have been cropped and layered into the resized
image from the RAW image. Photo details; Aperture Priority,
Focal Length 35 mm, F/11, Shutter Speed 1/640 sec, ISO 800(?) I
have discounted birds, insects, the moon, balloons, dust and
camera faults.
An interesting image whatever the anomaly may be. Perhaps
some of your readers may have an opinion. - Anonymous
| |
|||||||||
listening device
deployed in certain
sectors, take my
word on it, "Fal"
| |
|||||||||
